Survey on initial management of acute pancreatitis in Latin America / Encuesta sobre el manejo inicial de la pancreatitis aguda en América Latina

Objective: The population of Latin America harbors the highest incidence of gallstones and acute biliary pancreatitis, yet little is known about the initial management of acute pancreatitis in this large geographic region. Participants and methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of responses from physicians based in Latin America to the international multidisciplinary survey on the initial management of acute pancreatitis. The questionnaire asked about management of patients during the first 72h after admission, related to fluid therapy, prescription of prophylactic antibiotics, feeding and nutrition, and timing of cholecystectomy. Adherence to clinical guidelines in this region was compared with the rest of the world. Results: The survey was completed by 358 participants from 19 Latin American countries (median age, 39 years [33–47]; women, 27.1%). The proportion of participants in Latin America vs. the rest of the world who chose non-compliant options with clinical guidelines were: prescription of fluid therapy rate other than moderate (42.2% vs 34.3%, P=.02); prescription of prophylactic antibiotics for severe (10.6% vs 18.0%, P=.002), necrotizing (28.5% vs 36.9%, P=.008), or systemic inflammatory response syndrome-associated (21.2% vs 30.6%, P=.002) acute pancreatitis; not starting an oral diet to patients with oral tolerance (77.9% vs 71.1%, P=.02); and delayed cholecystectomy (16.2% vs 33.8%, P<.001). Conclusions: Surveyed physicians in Latin America are less likely to prescribe antibiotics and to delay cholecystectomy when managing patients in the initial phase of acute pancreatitis compared to physicians in the rest of the world. Feeding and nutrition appear to require the greatest improvement. (AU)

Objetivo: La población de América Latina alberga la mayor incidencia de cálculos biliares y pancreatitis biliar aguda, sin embargo, poco se sabe sobre el manejo inicial de la pancreatitis aguda en esta extensa región geográfica. Participantes y métodos: Se realizó un análisis post hoc de las respuestas de los médicos de América Latina a la encuesta internacional multidisciplinar sobre el tratamiento inicial de la pancreatitis aguda. En el cuestionario se preguntaba por el manejo de los pacientes durante las primeras 72 h tras el ingreso, en relación con la fluidoterapia, la prescripción de antibióticos profilácticos, la alimentación y nutrición y el momento de la colecistectomía. La adherencia a las guías clínicas en esta región se comparó con la del resto del mundo. Resultados: La encuesta fue completada por 358 participantes de 19 países latinoamericanos (mediana de edad, 39 años [33-47]; mujeres, 27,1%). La proporción de participantes de América Latina frente al resto del mundo que eligieron opciones no conformes con las guías clínicas fueron: prescripción de fluidoterapia en casos distintos de los moderados (42,2 vs. 34,3%, p = 0,02); prescripción de antibióticos profilácticos en casos graves (10,6 vs. 18%, p = 0,002); necrotizante (28,5 vs. 36,9%, p = 0,008) o asociada al síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica (21,2 vs. 30,6%, p = 0,002); no inicio de dieta oral en pacientes con tolerancia oral (77,9 vs. 71,1%, p = 0,02); y retraso de la colecistectomía (16,2 vs. 33,8%, p < 0,001). Conclusiones: Los médicos encuestados en América Latina son menos propensos a prescribir antibióticos y a retrasar la colecistectomía cuando tratan a pacientes en la fase inicial de la pancreatitis aguda, en comparación con los médicos del resto del mundo. La alimentación y la nutrición parecen requerir las mayores mejoras. (AU)

Survey on initial management of acute pancreatitis in Latin America.

OBJECTIVE: The population of Latin America harbors the highest incidence of gallstones and acute biliary pancreatitis, yet little is known about the initial management of acute pancreatitis in this large geographic region. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of responses from physicians based in Latin America to the international multidisciplinary survey on the initial management of acute pancreatitis. The questionnaire asked about management of patients during the first 72h after admission, related to fluid therapy, prescription of prophylactic antibiotics, feeding and nutrition, and timing of cholecystectomy. Adherence to clinical guidelines in this region was compared with the rest of the world. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 358 participants from 19 Latin American countries (median age, 39 years [33-47]; women, 27.1%). The proportion of participants in Latin America vs. the rest of the world who chose non-compliant options with clinical guidelines were: prescription of fluid therapy rate other than moderate (42.2% vs 34.3%, P=.02); prescription of prophylactic antibiotics for severe (10.6% vs 18.0%, P=.002), necrotizing (28.5% vs 36.9%, P=.008), or systemic inflammatory response syndrome-associated (21.2% vs 30.6%, P=.002) acute pancreatitis; not starting an oral diet to patients with oral tolerance (77.9% vs 71.1%, P=.02); and delayed cholecystectomy (16.2% vs 33.8%, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surveyed physicians in Latin America are less likely to prescribe antibiotics and to delay cholecystectomy when managing patients in the initial phase of acute pancreatitis compared to physicians in the rest of the world. Feeding and nutrition appear to require the greatest improvement.

Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Pancreatoduodenal Groove Pathology: Report of Three Cases and Brief Review of the Literature.

The pancreatoduodenal groove is a small area where pathologic processes involving the distal bile duct, duodenum, pancreatic head, ampulla of Vater, and retroperitoneum converge. Despite great advances in imaging techniques, a definitive preoperative diagnosis is challenging because of the complex anatomy of this area. Therefore, surgical intervention is frequently required because of the inability to completely exclude malignancy.
We report 3 cases of patients with different groove pathologies but similar clinical and imaging presentation, and show the essential role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in making a specific preoperative diagnosis, excluding malignancy in the first case, changing diagnosis in the second case, and confirming malignancy in the third case. EUS was a fundamental tool in this cohort of patients, not only because of its ability to provide superior visualization of a difficult anatomical region, but because of the ability to guide precise, realtime procedures, such as fine-needle aspiration.